I'm a technology attorney and the founder of Obvi AI, where I build tools on the belief that sophisticated legal and AI oversight capability shouldn't be rationed by budget. It should be available to the solo practitioner and the small firm just as readily as to the largest institutions.
J.D., Santa Clara University School of Law. Ph.D., Mechanical Engineering, Florida A&M University.
For me, that phrase covers two things I think belong together. The first is legal technology access: the idea that AI powered research, clearance, and analysis tools should meaningfully lower the cost of good legal work, not just make expensive work faster for firms that could already afford it. It's why I built Obvi AI's LexAura tool to surface the kind of trademark analysis that used to require an Am Law 100 budget; one general counsel told us it gave him an angle his own large firm hadn't considered.
The second is AI transparency: the idea that as AI systems increasingly shape what gets built, published, and represented in public discourse, the rules governing those systems, and how those systems represent us, should be legible and trackable by the public, not just by the companies that build them.
Lower the floor, not just raise the ceiling. I take on contract work building tools and workflows for firms and companies that need this kind of capability but couldn't otherwise justify building it in house. The goal isn't free, it's reachable: capability that used to be exclusive to the largest budgets, priced for the practices that actually need it.
Track the record, publicly. Claims about what AI systems do, and what regulators are doing about it, hold up better when the underlying evidence is something anyone can go check.
Pulse Tracking follows policy and regulatory developments across major AI vendors, announcements, enforcement actions, and reported changes, organized by theme and cross-referenced against sources, so the record stays checkable rather than taken on faith.
Open Pulse Tracking no account required